You have to like this. The last time the Israelis buzzed Boy Assad's house the sonic boom broke the windows. Message: We know where you live.
It must really suck to be a Great Dictator and not be able to take a nap when you want to.
30 June 2006
New York Times: Yawn.
The latest act of treason at the New York Times should have been anticipated. The NYT long ago stopped having anything original to say. They're more like the old Pravda or the Peoples Daily in that on any issue you know, without reading the story, exactly what the Times is going to say.
They used to be important, then they were deliberately obtuse and kind of patronizing, now they're just boring.
They used to be important, then they were deliberately obtuse and kind of patronizing, now they're just boring.
Stop, or we'll blow ourselves up.
"Hamas Sets Conditions For Soldier's Release"
Doesn't look to me like the bright boys in Gaza City are in any position to have conditions about anything.
Doesn't look to me like the bright boys in Gaza City are in any position to have conditions about anything.
22 June 2006
Report an Unusual Animal to ABC
What If There's Already a Warhead?
I hope (but without much confidence) that someone besides me is thinking about this. What if Bouffant Boy has already put some kind of warhead on the missile that North Korea is about to test? What if BB has decided that a demonstration detonation in the Aleutians or somewhere in the north Pacific would be a dandy way to impress the world with his seriousness? What do we know: 1) the NoKo's have at least one weaponized fission device; 2) the NoKo's have at least one--but probably only one-- long range missile; 3) the NoKo's are led by a man whose world view is not, strictly speaking, firmly grounded in objective reality. Given those three facts, shouldn't we (by which I mean the West), be giving serious consideration to destroying the launch site? We know where it is, we can see it and we have all sorts of large explosive devices that can be delivered with great accuracy. (right, Zark? What was that? You're gurgling again.) We do not, a week from now, want to be explaining why Seattle will be uninhabited for the next 400 years due to fallout from one explosion somewhere in Alaska.
19 June 2006
Just Shoot It Down
If Kim "Bouffant Boy" Jong-il goes ahead with his missile test, the United States and Japan should make every effort to shoot the thing down. I don't know whether we have any functioning component of SDI in the area, but if so this would be as good a time as any for a live test. What are North Korean's going to do, complain to the UN? Then again.....
Keep Your Eye on the Red Dot
"North Korea appeared close Sunday to test-firing a long-range missile capable of reaching the United States, prompting the White House to warn of an appropriate response and Japan to threaten a "fierce" protest to the United Nations."
Just listen for the loud bang, Bouffant Boy.
Just listen for the loud bang, Bouffant Boy.
10 June 2006
What was that? Rosebud? Raisins?
"He mumbled something, but it was indistinguishable and it was very short," U.S. military spokesman Maj. Gen. William Caldwell said at a news conference."
Rot in hell.
Rot in hell.
9 June 2006
8 June 2006
Abu al-Zarqawi, Dead Man.
If this BBC story is correct, it's a great day. Rumours of this thug's demise have been exaggerated in the past however, so I'll hold off on the celebrating until I see some body parts. Maybe one of those jammed machine guns let him down. At any rate he was a murderous, psychotic sub-human and he died like a rat in a hole.
7 June 2006
Just When You Think It Can't Get Worse
Nurse Martin has not been struck off.
Granted the conditions imposed means that she's unlikely to practice again, but why didn't the board just say that this person believes that it is permissable to take a human life if she thinks her victim is suffering too much, and so is utterly unfit to be a nurse...and especially unfit to work in critical care and intensive care, which is her specialization?
Just imagine, you're in intensive care after an accident, in terrible pain and just this side of the grave, but man, you do want to fight, you do want to live...and who walks in but Nurse Angel-of-Death.
Just let me know which hospital she winds up at so I can avoid it.
Granted the conditions imposed means that she's unlikely to practice again, but why didn't the board just say that this person believes that it is permissable to take a human life if she thinks her victim is suffering too much, and so is utterly unfit to be a nurse...and especially unfit to work in critical care and intensive care, which is her specialization?
Just imagine, you're in intensive care after an accident, in terrible pain and just this side of the grave, but man, you do want to fight, you do want to live...and who walks in but Nurse Angel-of-Death.
Just let me know which hospital she winds up at so I can avoid it.
6 June 2006
Hospital Waiting Lists a Problem? Call Nurse Martin
TVNZ has this story on would-be murderer Lesley Martin's hearing as to whether or not she should be struck off as a nurse. Why, surely there's no reason why a woman who did her best to murder her own mother as an act of "mercy" shoudn't be allowed to nurse other peoples parents. To quote from the story:
"Martin, who is a nurse, was found guilty of attempting to murder her mother by an overdose of morphine, and spent seven-and-a-half months in Arohata prison.
The Nursing Council referred Martin to the Tribunal after conducting an investigation that concluded her conduct might affect her fitness to practise as a nurse."
Got that? Being a euthanasia campaigner and trying to commit murder MIGHT affect her fitness to be a nurse.
"Martin, who is a nurse, was found guilty of attempting to murder her mother by an overdose of morphine, and spent seven-and-a-half months in Arohata prison.
The Nursing Council referred Martin to the Tribunal after conducting an investigation that concluded her conduct might affect her fitness to practise as a nurse."
Got that? Being a euthanasia campaigner and trying to commit murder MIGHT affect her fitness to be a nurse.
4 June 2006
What do these 12 people have in common?
1. Fahim Ahmad, 21, Toronto;
2. Zakaria Amara, 20, Mississauga, Ont.;
3. Asad Ansari, 21, Mississauga;
4. Shareef Abdelhaleen, 30, Mississauga;
5. Qayyum Abdul Jamal, 43, Mississauga;
6. Mohammed Dirie, 22, Kingston, Ont.;
7. Yasim Abdi Mohamed, 24, Kingston;
8. Jahmaal James, 23, Toronto;
9. Amin Mohamed Durrani, 19, Toronto;
10. Steven Vikash Chand alias Abdul Shakur, 25, Toronto;
11. Ahmad Mustafa Ghany, 21, Mississauga;
According to the Mounties, nothing at all. They're just lads from the "broad spectra of society" who "for various reasons appear to have become adherents of a violent ideology inspired by al-Qaeda." "Various reasons?" "Appear to to have become"? Let's see if it works better my way, twelve urban dwelling Muslims purchase three tons of ammonium nitrate, enough to take out a city block. Nah, just a coincidence I'm sure. Probably just wanted to plant some potatoes in the vegie patch. Broad spectra of society? As Michelle Malkin puts it, a regular Benetton ad. Yep, no way twleve bearded Muslim men who attended training camp together could have anything in common, and you sir, are racist and a knave for thinking otherwise.
2. Zakaria Amara, 20, Mississauga, Ont.;
3. Asad Ansari, 21, Mississauga;
4. Shareef Abdelhaleen, 30, Mississauga;
5. Qayyum Abdul Jamal, 43, Mississauga;
6. Mohammed Dirie, 22, Kingston, Ont.;
7. Yasim Abdi Mohamed, 24, Kingston;
8. Jahmaal James, 23, Toronto;
9. Amin Mohamed Durrani, 19, Toronto;
10. Steven Vikash Chand alias Abdul Shakur, 25, Toronto;
11. Ahmad Mustafa Ghany, 21, Mississauga;
According to the Mounties, nothing at all. They're just lads from the "broad spectra of society" who "for various reasons appear to have become adherents of a violent ideology inspired by al-Qaeda." "Various reasons?" "Appear to to have become"? Let's see if it works better my way, twelve urban dwelling Muslims purchase three tons of ammonium nitrate, enough to take out a city block. Nah, just a coincidence I'm sure. Probably just wanted to plant some potatoes in the vegie patch. Broad spectra of society? As Michelle Malkin puts it, a regular Benetton ad. Yep, no way twleve bearded Muslim men who attended training camp together could have anything in common, and you sir, are racist and a knave for thinking otherwise.
27 May 2006
A Correction
I'm back. It's been a busy and rather unpleasant few weeks here on the mountain. Never mind that though, I have a correction to make, No, no not of any my stuff..but of a certain mindset held by those on the left. Contrary to received wisdom, conservatives for the most part are not inclined to support "the party" or even Our Leader, when they do things that are overly ideologically unsound or, worse, things that are manifestly stupid. For that reason, the Republicans are highly likely to lose at at least one house of Congress in the upcoming election.
Whereas the Angry Left and their fellow travellers will donate to and vote for anyone, knave or fool, who is not the Other, conservatives will let their man or their party go down in flames rather than vote for someone who they believe takes them for granted or for fools.
Thus as W morphs into LBJ, his approval ratings plummet. Those aren't Democrats causing the numbers to go so low they'll soon have ro be measured on the Kelvin scale. Democrats, even nominal ones, were never on the positive side of that question. Those are conservatives voting with their bare or booted feet against a President and a party who have failed them on trade, failed them on the deficit, failed them on taxes, failed to prosecute the war, presided over a massive expansion of entitlements and corporate welfare and then took them for idiots during the immigration debate. Are American conservatives to be left with a choice between bad and worse?
Democrats should make W a saint. He's all but detroyed the house that Reagan built.
Whereas the Angry Left and their fellow travellers will donate to and vote for anyone, knave or fool, who is not the Other, conservatives will let their man or their party go down in flames rather than vote for someone who they believe takes them for granted or for fools.
Thus as W morphs into LBJ, his approval ratings plummet. Those aren't Democrats causing the numbers to go so low they'll soon have ro be measured on the Kelvin scale. Democrats, even nominal ones, were never on the positive side of that question. Those are conservatives voting with their bare or booted feet against a President and a party who have failed them on trade, failed them on the deficit, failed them on taxes, failed to prosecute the war, presided over a massive expansion of entitlements and corporate welfare and then took them for idiots during the immigration debate. Are American conservatives to be left with a choice between bad and worse?
Democrats should make W a saint. He's all but detroyed the house that Reagan built.
13 April 2006
10 April 2006
Reverse Invasion
This is bloody brilliant. I love it. The US will agree to allow open immigration from Mexico if Mexico extends the same privilege to American and Canadian citizens. That includes the automatic right to free (and bilingual) education,the right to work, the unrestricted right to buy land (foreign nationals in Mexico are highly restricted in what sort of investments they're allowed), to start and own 100% of a company, automatic Mexican citizenship on a reciprocal basis, etc. We'll see who changes whose country.
Affleckted
Ben Affleck moves from being a mere John Kerry suckass to being utterly deranged. I hope the Secret Service is having a heart to heart with him.
9 April 2006
Media Idiocy on Iran.
Not even the Telegraph is immune from MSM idiocy. Granted, the story and the real idiocy appeared in the Washington Post, the Telegraph should have reworded the misleading headline. The story purports to show that President Bush is planning a nuclear strike on Iran. All that really happened though is that among any number of military options presented to the White House (not to mention those short of military action), was one for the use of nuclear bunker-busting armaments. Since those options presumably range from doing nothing at all to an all out invasion, the limited use of a single tactical nuclear weapon would be in there someplace. One hopes it doesn't come to that, but if its a choice between an dangerous wacko who thinks he's the second coming of the hidden imam with a nuke in each hand, and a tactical strike, well I know what gets my vote.
7 April 2006
Hamas and China

Vital Perspective is one of the few blogs to explore the links between Beijing and Islamists and China's hopes of using Islamism to harass and distract the US...as long as it doesn't include Muslims in Xinjiang of course. China has its own little Chechnya in waiting out there. I hope Zahar has time to get some suits made while he's in China.
Another Reason to Love John Howard
Mark Steyn has this from the almost the only world leader to tell the truth about Islam.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)